Capital Projects Bonds
Potential February 2027 Bond: The Process so Far
What the 10-Year Facilities Plan Identified
Vashon Island School District completed a Long-Range Facilities Master Plan to assess the condition of district buildings and identify priorities for the next decade. The plan found that many core building systems are nearing or beyond their expected lifespan and that several facilities no longer fully support today’s educational programs.
The facilities assessment identified significant needs across the district, including:
- Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that need replacement or major upgrades.
- Aging plumbing and electrical systems, including boilers, water heaters, generators, and distribution equipment.
- Roofs, windows, siding, and exterior walls that require repair or replacement.
- Fire alarm and emergency communication systems that will need continued modernization.
- Safety and security improvements, including access controls, lighting, fencing, and surveillance.
The plan found that several buildings and spaces no longer meet current educational needs. Recommendations include:
- Modernizing or replacing McMurray Middle School, with appropriately sized classrooms, updated science and CTE spaces, a school kitchen, larger commons area, and improved accessibility and security.
- Expanding the Chautauqua Elementary commons and kitchen to improve meal service, seating, and student circulation.
- Modernizing or replacing the high school gym to create a secure, accessible facility that meets competition requirements.
- Replacing aging FamilyLink and StudentLink facilities with a permanent shared building designed to support both programs.
The plan also identified opportunities to better support students and staff by:
- Creating spaces for confidential telehealth and counseling services.
- Providing safe, inclusive, and accessible restrooms.
- Improving science, art, and career and technical education (CTE) learning environments.
- Addressing storage needs and improving specialized program spaces.
Because school facilities are important community assets, the plan recommends continued partnerships and shared use opportunities, including:
- Upgrades to athletic fields and tennis courts.
- Expanded use of facilities by community partners.
- Continued collaboration to maximize the value of district spaces.
-
The facilities assessment identified significant needs across the district, including:
- Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that need replacement or major upgrades.
- Aging plumbing and electrical systems, including boilers, water heaters, generators, and distribution equipment.
- Roofs, windows, siding, and exterior walls that require repair or replacement.
- Fire alarm and emergency communication systems that will need continued modernization.
- Safety and security improvements, including access controls, lighting, fencing, and surveillance.
-
The plan found that several buildings and spaces no longer meet current educational needs. Recommendations include:
- Modernizing or replacing McMurray Middle School, with appropriately sized classrooms, updated science and CTE spaces, a school kitchen, larger commons area, and improved accessibility and security.
- Expanding the Chautauqua Elementary commons and kitchen to improve meal service, seating, and student circulation.
- Modernizing or replacing the high school gym to create a secure, accessible facility that meets competition requirements.
- Replacing aging FamilyLink and StudentLink facilities with a permanent shared building designed to support both programs.
-
The plan also identified opportunities to better support students and staff by:
- Creating spaces for confidential telehealth and counseling services.
- Providing safe, inclusive, and accessible restrooms.
- Improving science, art, and career and technical education (CTE) learning environments.
- Addressing storage needs and improving specialized program spaces.
-
Because school facilities are important community assets, the plan recommends continued partnerships and shared use opportunities, including:
- Upgrades to athletic fields and tennis courts.
- Expanded use of facilities by community partners.
- Continued collaboration to maximize the value of district spaces.
Bond Planning Task Force Meetings
Over the course of five meetings in Spring 2026, a Bond Planning Task Force Meeting, made up of district employees and Vashon Island community members, engaged in discussions surrounding school facility priorities and the potential development of a future bond for Vashon voters to consider.
For more details about each meeting and how the Bond Planning Task Force arrived at this decision, please see the accordion below.
-
This meeting introduced the purpose of the Bond Planning Task Force Committee and how the long-range facilities master plan is designed to help guide the process. The long-range facilities plan bundled every single potential need for the district into one of six thematic buckets:
- Safety and Security Upgrades
- System Upgrades
- Targeted Improvements
- Major Modernization Addition or Expansion
- Community Partnerships
- Enrollment Efficiencies
The committee broke into small groups and looked at different scenarios for potential bond projects that mixed and matched projects from various containers. The small groups then explained their choices and the committee engaged in discussions around the various results. Participants discussed trade-offs between priorities, including the potential construction of new buildings and upgrades to existing facilties.

-
State of the Schools
The meeting began with the group reflecting on the educational assessment from the work done on the 10-year facilities master plan, with a scale of: 1 - works well, needs minimal improvement; 2 - needs improvements to meet standards; and 3 - poor, large scale improvements needed.
This included an asset report, which rated over 400 maintainable assets VISD possesses, ranging from everything to roofing to exhaust systems. The ratings were based on observed condition, cost, impact to students, remaining life, and then provided composite scores based on importance.
Going in chronological order of when the building was first built, the team presented the scores, providing data points for the overall conditions of buildings as they relate to their use by the District. Understandably, older buildings, such as the high school gym and McMurray Middle School scored poorly compared to the newer buildings, such as Chautauqua Elementary and the main Vashon High building.
The task force then broke into small groups to discuss what they noticed about the building conditions that surprised them and what they wanted to learn more about.
Talking Money
Ryan Swanson and Trevor Carlson of Piper Sandler were invited to the meeting to present about the financials of bonds and the differences between bonds and levies. They explained how districts can collect funds and explained historical tax rates on Vashon, providing comparisons to other districts with similar assessed values.
They then presented hypothetical bond scenarios to provide an idea of how much money various tax rates would generate in bond monies.
The meeting concluded with a quick update on project costs. It was highlighted that in 2020, the construction cost index trend in Seattle rose 26.06 percent as the global pandemic disrupted the global supply chain, and prices have never recovered. As an example, when Vashon High School was completed in 2017, its construction costs equated to approximately $33.4 million, or $411 per square foot. If the building was to be built today, it would theoretically cost $67.3 million, with a total cost per square foot of $829.
-
During this meeting, the Bond Planning Task Force Committee looked at program iniatives surrounding safety/security, technology and infrastructure, athletics and fields, food service, career and technical education (CTE), and science, with presenters who work in the initiatives presenting the challenges they face today due to current building conditions and how potential bond projects could help alleviate concerns.
Safety and Security
Highlighted deficiencies in safety and security (both physical and digital) were perimeter security around the VISD campus and visitor management systems (e.g. no vestibules at McMurray or Chautauqua, lack of lockdown buttons, electronic entry/access control).
Potential bond projects to address these issues could include perimeter security upgrades such as fencing, access gates, and bollards; reviewing expanding electronic address systems; increasing security camera coverage at all schools; adding vestibules to buildings that lack them; continuing fire alarm system upgrades; and adding/maintaining window coverings.
Technology
Highlighed issues of access surrounding sound and display systems across school classrooms and gyms, lack of proper cooling and ventilation for critical network infrastructure at McMurray, and lack of necessary IT storage/workspace due to the condition of Building F.
Potential bond improvements could address upgrading all classroom sound reinforcement systems, updating outdated sound and display systems across classrooms in the district, ugprade distrcit-wide intercom system with emergency alert capability, among others.
Athletics
Highlighed issues surrounding lack of access, including lack of restroom facilties (visitors must use port-a-potties), proper spaces for officials to change, storage space in gymnasiums at both VHS and McM, necessary seismic safety upgrades to the gymnasiums at VHS and McM and the VHS stadium, and overall field improvements for the McM and the practice fields at VHS.
Potential bond improvements could address ADA issues at the VHS gym, upgrade field lights at McM and VHS practice field to support community-use during winter months, and synthetic turf upgrades to help conserve water and improve overall condition of fields for community use.
Food Service
Highlighted issues included the lack of a kitchen/cafeteria at McM (food is currently made at VHS and then delivered to McM), lack of capacity for students to eat lunch at CES, and increased need for more storage/freezer space to receive bulk price breaks and reduce processing/delivery fees.
Potential bond improvements could include a full kitchen at McM and an expanded kitchen at CES, increased space at McM to support CTE foods program, and more outdoor freezers for storage.
Careet and Technical Education (CTE)
The CTE presentation largely centered on what CTE is and how it integrates throughout the course offerings at McM and VHS. Highlighted issues included a STEM pipeline gap from McM to VHS, a gender gap in specific programs, and flexible and dedicated spaces to respond to student needs.
Potential bond improvements could create classrooms for flexibile use and more consistent pathways bridging offerings between McM and VHS.
Science
Highlighted issues surrounded the deficiencies of the science classrooms at McM, including overcrowded classrooms, one sink (for entire classroom), lack of power outlets for science equipment, and limited storage. Other issues noted the exterior and isolated location of the 7th and 8th grade science rooms.
Potential bond improvements could address these problems by creating new spaces that allow for more flexible science classrooms and better locations to integrate the science team and students.
-
This meeting continued looking at various needs of district programs and intiatives, focusing on needs of student services, the music program and performing arts.
Student Services
Highlighted issues centered on accessibility and inclusivity across various aspects throughout the district, such as automatic doors and curb cuts for individuals with mobility challenges, accessible restrooms in all buildings for students who need both privacy and assistance, and improving access of individuals with vision impairments.
Potential bond improvements could address accessibility and inclusivity concerns, benefitting both the students and the community members who use district spaces outside of the school day.
Music Program
Highlighted issues centered on problems with each space at their respective buildings – at McM: no performance area, lack of storage for personal instruments, overall acoustic issues, poor heating and cooling in room (negatively effects condition of instruments); at VHS: no close access to bathroom; sound system is underpowered in band room and gym; and no performance area for pep band to play as one unit.
Potential bond improvements could address issues surrounding each music classroom and performance space.
Performing Arts
Highlighted issues around accessibility for all students, student safety problems, lack of plugs for electricy, and no capacity to further interests of students who want to learn more about lighting, projections, and sound designs.
Potential bond improvements could address safety concerns and allow the space for students to explore their interest in lighting, direction, and set design.
After hearing from the various programs, the committee examined six potential bond proposals, each ranging in costs and showcasing how different bond proposals can address the areas identified as needing improvement in the 10 year facilities master plan. Components of these proposals were organized into six themes:
- Safety and security upgrades
- System upgrades
- Targeted improvements
- Major Modernization, addition, or expansion
- Community partnerships
- Enrollment efficiencies
-
In the final spring meeting of the Bond Task Force Planning Committee, members examined the state of conditions related to physical education and athletic programs, noting the wide variety of condition needs, ranging from drainage in playfields to storage in the gym to accessibility issues throughout.
Finally, the committee looked at five different proposals, each with a different price tag and different components they addressed. These scenarios ranged $44.8 million to $160.6 million dollars (beginning on slide 30). The committee was then presented with information related to VISD’s historical and projected district tax rate relative to the various scenario (beginning on slide 41).
The committee then broke into small groups to discuss what scenario best meets the district’s needs as stated by the 10 year facilities master plan and how a bond proposal can best support everyone’s priorities. Although a majority of committee representatives felt that a bond proposal which included a new middle school and a new gym, among many other projects, ultimately, the bond committee noted that overall community feedback on the state of facilities and potential projects is the most important piece of knowledge to have in any given scenario.
-
- July 25: Bond Planning Task Force will make an initial recommendation to the school board based off the discussions of the committee.
- Summer 2026: Bond Planning Task Force works on surveying Vashon voters and events/community outreach to try and get as many responses as possible.
- September 14: Bond Planning Task Force reconvenes for another meeting to integrate feedback received throughout the summer.
- September 24: A final recommendation regarding a potential bond proposal is given to the VISD board of directors.
- July 25: Bond Planning Task Force will make an initial recommendation to the school board based off the discussions of the committee.
We Want Your Feedback - Bond Planning Community Survey
The Vashon Island School District is gathering community feedback to help inform long-range facilities planning and potential future capital improvement projects. This survey is intended to collect community input only. No decisions have been made regarding a future bond measure, project list, or funding amount. Responses will help the District better understand community priorities, concerns, and preferred communication methods. Estimated completion time: 5-8 minutes.
Bond Frequently Asked Questions
Over the past several months, Vashon Island School District has been evaluating facility needs, reviewing financial information, and working with a community-based Bond Planning Task Force to identify priorities for future facility investments. The Task Force recommended that the District prioritize investments in the Vashon High School gymnasium and McMurray Middle School while also identifying opportunities to maintain existing facilities, improve building systems and energy performance, and support community use of District facilities. Throughout this process, the District should carefully consider project costs, long-term value, and potential taxpayer impact.
The Task Force also recommended that the District continue engaging the broader community before developing a final recommendation for the School Board's consideration in fall 2026.
The next phase of work focuses on gathering additional community input, better understanding community priorities and concerns, and evaluating potential facility investment options. No bond amount or final project package has been determined. Community feedback collected throughout 2026 will help inform future Board discussions and decisions.
-
The District has completed an initial evaluation of facility needs through its 10-Year Facilities Master Plan. The Bond Planning Task Force then reviewed those needs and developed recommendations to help prioritize future facility investments. The next phase focuses on gathering broader community input through surveys, events, and other engagement opportunities. Feedback collected during this process will help inform future planning and School Board discussions regarding potential facility investments.
-
The Bond Planning Task Force is a volunteer group of Vashon community members formed to help the District evaluate future facility needs and priorities. The group reviewed facility assessments, enrollment information, financial considerations, educational goals, and long-term maintenance needs. Throughout the process, members discussed potential approaches to addressing facility needs, considered tradeoffs among competing priorities, and explored how future investments could support students and the broader community.
The Task Force's role was advisory in nature. Its recommendations are intended to help inform future planning and School Board discussions but do not represent final decisions. The School Board will continue to evaluate information, gather community input, and consider future options before determining whether to advance a potential bond measure.
-
No. The District is currently evaluating facility needs, project priorities, cost estimates, community feedback, and potential funding strategies. No decision has been made regarding a future bond measure, and no bond amount has been determined. Any future recommendations would be considered through a public process and discussed by the School Board before any decisions are made. For more information on the current timeline, click here.
-
Yes. The survey is only one part of the community engagement process. Over the coming months, the District expects to host facility tours, community meetings, open houses, and presentations while also participating in local events and meeting with community organizations. These activities are intended to help the District hear from a wide range of community members before future facility investment recommendations are developed. Upcoming opportunities will be posted on this website and shared through District communications. Look for us at your next local event.
-
The District has a responsibility to maintain school facilities, plan for future needs, and regularly evaluate the condition and performance of its buildings. As part of this responsibility, Washington State and the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) require school districts to engage in long-range facilities planning and periodically assess school facilities.
As buildings and building systems age, the District evaluates facility conditions, maintenance needs, educational adequacy, accessibility, energy performance, operational requirements, and community use. The planning process helps the District understand how facilities are performing today, identify potential future needs, and explore options for addressing those needs over time.
This work supports the District's responsibility to be a thoughtful steward of public assets while providing facilities that support educational programs, accessibility, inclusion, and the long-term needs of the Vashon community.
-
Enrollment is one factor in facility planning, but it is not the only factor. School facilities continue to age and require ongoing maintenance, repair, replacement, and periodic upgrades regardless of enrollment trends.
Facility planning also considers how well existing buildings support current educational programs, accessibility, inclusion, safety, energy performance, operational needs, and community use. As educational practices, technology, program requirements, and community expectations evolve over time, the District periodically evaluates whether existing facilities continue to align with the educational goals and priorities identified in the District's Strategic Plan. The planning process helps the District assess facility conditions, understand future needs, and evaluate potential options for maintaining and improving school facilities over the long term.
-
No. The purpose of this planning effort is to evaluate how District facilities can best support the students who live in and are served by Vashon Island School District. The focus of this work is stewardship of community assets and supporting the educational programs and experiences identified in the District's Strategic Plan. This planning effort is focused on Vashon students, their educational experience, and the community's longstanding commitment to its public schools.
-
In Washington State, public school funding is built on a partnership between state funding and local voter-approved funding measures. The state provides funding for basic education, but school districts often rely on local levies and bonds to support programs, services, technology, facility maintenance, and capital improvements that are not fully funded through state resources.
-
The District is evaluating a wide range of facility needs, including building systems, educational spaces, accessibility, safety, energy performance, and community use. Examples may include:
- Roofing, building envelope, and structural repairs
- Heating, ventilation, electrical, and plumbing systems
- Safety and security improvements
- Accessibility and inclusion improvements
- Classroom modernization
- Science, art, and Career and Technical Education (CTE or “vocational”) spaces
- Athletic and activity facilities
- Kitchens, commons, and gathering spaces
- Energy efficiency and sustainability improvements
- Site improvements and outdoor learning environments
The District is also evaluating how facilities support educational programs and student experiences. Learning takes place in classrooms as well as science labs, art spaces, career and technical education programs, libraries, commons areas, athletic facilities, and outdoor learning environments. Facilities planning considers how these spaces support the District's educational goals, student well-being, accessibility, inclusion, operational needs, and community use.
-
Facility priorities are informed by detailed facility assessments, maintenance records, educational needs, operational considerations, long-term planning, and community input.
-
A school bond is a voter-approved funding tool used to pay for major capital projects such as building improvements, major renovations, replacements, and other long-term facility investments. Bond funds may only be used for capital purposes and cannot be used for day-to-day operating expenses such as salaries, utilities, transportation, or classroom supplies.
In Washington State, school bonds require approval from at least 60% of voters, along with a minimum voter turnout requirement established by state law. If approved by voters, bond funding is repaid over time through property taxes.
-
Yes. In February 2024, Vashon voters approved a four-year Capital Technology (Cap/Tech) Levy that provides funding for technology, safety and security improvements, maintenance, and other capital improvement projects throughout the District.
Capital levies and bonds are different funding tools and are often used together as part of a long-range facilities strategy. Capital levies typically fund smaller-scale capital projects, technology, maintenance, equipment, and facility improvements over a shorter period of time. Bonds are generally used for larger capital projects such as major renovations, building replacements, significant accessibility improvements, and major infrastructure upgrades.
-
Capital levies are an important funding source for ongoing facility improvements, maintenance, technology, and safety projects. However, the amount of funding that can be generated through a levy is limited by state law in relation to the size of the District's tax base.
For larger capital projects, generating sufficient funding through a levy alone may require a substantially higher tax rate because the funds must be collected over a shorter period of time. Bonds and levies are different funding tools designed for different purposes, and school districts often evaluate both when considering long-term facility needs.
-
Potentially. Washington State provides school construction assistance through the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP). SCAP funding operates as a matching program. School districts must first provide a local funding source before becoming eligible to receive state assistance. The amount of state funding varies based on eligibility criteria established by the State of Washington and the specific characteristics of a project.
-
Project timing is one of many factors considered during long-range planning. Construction costs are influenced by labor availability, material costs, market conditions, and other economic factors that can change over time.
Like many school districts throughout Washington, Vashon Island School District experienced significant construction cost increases following the COVID-19 pandemic. During that period, inflation, supply chain disruptions, and workforce shortages affected the cost of construction projects across the region.
One way to understand the impact of construction cost escalation is to look at projects that have already been completed. Vashon High School was constructed in 2017 at a cost of approximately $33.4 million, or about $411 per square foot. Based on current construction costs, a similar facility could cost approximately $67.3 million, or about $829 per square foot.
While future construction costs cannot be predicted with certainty, project timing remains an important consideration when evaluating long-term facility needs and potential funding strategies. When projects are phased over many years, the District must consider not only the cost of the improvements themselves, but also the potential impact of future construction cost escalation, additional design and mobilization costs, and the continued maintenance of facilities awaiting improvement.
For this reason, the District evaluates both individual projects and groups of projects to better understand the long-term cost, timing, and taxpayer implications of different approaches. One objective of the planning process is to determine whether addressing multiple facility needs together may be more cost-effective than completing the same work over an extended period of time.
-
Sustainability and energy performance are important considerations in the District's facilities planning process. As facility needs are evaluated, the District reviews opportunities to improve the efficiency and performance of building systems, reduce energy consumption, and support responsible stewardship of community resources.
Energy use affects both environmental impact and operating costs. Utility costs, maintenance expenses, and replacement cycles are ongoing obligations that continue throughout the life of a facility. Because these expenses are paid from the District's General Fund, facility planning considers not only the initial cost of a project, but also how buildings perform, operate, and are maintained over time.
The District is evaluating facility options through multiple lenses, including educational needs, accessibility, sustainability, energy performance, lifecycle costs, operational costs, and community priorities. Community feedback will help the District better understand how these considerations should be weighed as future facility options are developed and evaluated.
-
Community input is an important part of the planning process and is being gathered before any final project package, funding amount, or recommendation has been determined. The District is seeking feedback to better understand community priorities, concerns, questions, and information needs. This input will help inform the evaluation of facility needs, potential project options, funding considerations, and future recommendations presented to the School Board.
Community feedback will also help the District understand how residents view tradeoffs associated with different approaches, including project scope, timing, cost, potential tax impacts, educational priorities, sustainability, and community use of facilities. Input is one of several factors considered during planning and decision-making. It will be reviewed alongside facility assessments, educational and operational needs, financial analysis, regulatory requirements, and School Board direction as future options are developed and evaluated.
-
Community members can complete the survey, attend public meetings, participate in community engagement opportunities, visit the project website, and sign up for District communications.
If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding the bond planning, please email bond@vashonsd.org.

